Compare and Contrast of the Od

Sophocles Oedipus the baron and Homers Odyssey ii deal on the topic of loyalty. In both flora the character Tiresias, a blind prophet, participates in the divers(prenominal) tours by denounceing various(a) equitys to the primary(prenominal) characters. bandage the main importance of Tiresias in The Odyssey is to enter that righteousness seat joint be useful, his importance in Oedipus the power is to guarantee to discourage Oedipus on his journey to find the trueness be arouse he k in a flashs the reasonably play corporation be negative as well.         The first of all thing that should be examined is the distinguishable ways that Tiresias reveals the rightfulness in the two works. In The Odyssey, Tiresias is direct and to the point. He starts by stating that A sweet smooth journey phratry is what you translatek, only if a god depart make it hard for you. From what potentiometer be read, Tiresias feels no need sugarcoat what he is notifi cation for two simple fountains. First, he came willingly to Odysseus, sugarcoating the uprightness would be a waste of time. The second and much all important(predicate) reason is that he has close intelligence activity for Odysseus, relative to what has happened so far. On the slightly other hand, in Oedipus the King, Tiresias skirts around give tongue to Oedipus the true statement. In position, he initially ref utilise to tell Oedipus anything at all, seen in such lines as Youll retrieve nothing from me and Ill never reveal my terrific secrets. The important thing is that when Oedipus got Tiresias angered, Tiresias flat turn up stated that [Oedipus is] the curse, the corruption of the land. When Oedipus responds to this, which will be discussed later, he continues to chide Tiresias for lying. Following that, Sophocles uses Tiresias to omen the rest of the play for the reader, objet dart cryptically half-hiding and half- state Oedipus the truth, which is essenti ally ignored. The fact that Tiresias had to ! be summ mavend, instead of overture on his own, and that Tiresias attempted to brood the truth from Oedipus, shows that Tiresias was trying to defend Oedipus. He knew it would cause Oedipus ill-treat in the end. Tiresias differing attitudes in the works serves as a couple to how the truth told in wide distri notwithstandinged. Truth that brings hope to people is ordinarily easily given, only when truth that brings sadness or despair is customaryly told with worry and reluctance.         The response to the information given by Tiresias is also important due to its difference. In Homers work, Odysseus reaction to the news is different than the joy that one energy normally expect. kind of of a reaction of happiness or joy, Odysseus simply asks how he arse communicate with his dead mother. tho this in itself reveals something important. Essentially, Odysseus is promptly awargon that he has more than a good chance of move home soon, but liquid cannot be overjoyed because of var. that he has suffered so far. wiz could say that he is simply not near as worried as he was before, essentially he now has hope to arrive home to his wife and son because of Tiresias revelation. Oedipus reaction, on the other hand, is much different from that of Odysseus. Simply put, the reaction to the truth that Tiresias reveals is utter disbelief and anger. Oedipus can not comprehend that he could be the plague, so he accuses Tiresias aligned with Creon in a part of a game to overthrow him. The irony beingness that it is Oedipus the one searching for the truth, but when it is told, he is to close-minded to see it. Eventually Oedipus finds out the truth for himself and must originalize that Tiresias was telling the truth, especially about being go of not discriminating the truth of his heritage and actions. The significance of this equality is that it also reveals the general reaction of ships company to truth. While Odysseus reaction was not of the win up and do a quick-witted dance type, one ca! n still see that he benefited from the truth, and in that respectfore had to be at least somewhat appreciative of what Tiresias told him. In the subject area of Oedipus, the truth proved to be mischievous and therefore denied at first until it was confirmed by second source. In the in truth world, it is essentially the same. If finding out the truth succors someone, they would generally be appreciative of cheating the truth at the very least. On the other hand, if the truth is harmful, the general reaction is to deny it until there can be no doubt. To put it very simply, good news is discontinue than forged news.         Although already somewhat covered, the make of Tiresias informing the two main characters and the story as a whole should also be examined in a more specific manner.

The effect of Tiresias telling Odysseus the truth and guiding is The Odyssey is piano to see. Because of what Odysseus learnt from Tiresias, Odysseus was given hope and managed to rejoin home to Ithaca. In other words, because of what Tiresias told him, he managed to complete his journey home. The result of what Tiresias told Oedipus in Oedipus the King is a bit more convoluted than with The Odyssey. While what Tiresias told Oedipus was true, Sophocles used that scene more as a way to auspicate what would happen later on in the play quite an than a direct maculation motivator. This can be seen in the fact that Oedipus essentially discounts Tiresias prophecy, win over himself that Tiresias is trying to mess with him. further what Tiresias told Oedipus did behave an effect, although different than what would have been expected, especially since Tiresias was a bank and respected seer. That effect was the brin! g about of suspicion in Oedipus mind of whether or not he really was the soulfulness who murdered Laius. As a result of this suspicion, Oedipus began to pursue the truth with more fervor, which did eventually proceed to his confirming the truth that Tiresias had already hinted at. In relation to the real world, this is significant because it shows that while truth is a wonderful and helpful idea, it is better to not know the truth because of the pain it can cause.         Both these works, when taken in comparison to each other, reveal much about how society tends to deal with the subject of truth. On the one location, represented by The Odyssey, is the idea that truth is beneficial, and can help one on their own personal journeys finished life. Sophocles Oedipus the King represents the other side of truth, the bad and potentially harmful side. This play shows that there are truths that people are better off not knowing, for it would cause them more harm than good . As can be seen, both these works views on truth do play hard into how society as a whole generally views and reacts to different kinds of truth, being the good truths that help and the bad truths that hinder. If you want to get a full essay, arrange it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.